Insists Brand is to highlight, to counter the effects and developments of the global management of resources determined by the structures of domination, we need a broad public debate and practical steps towards the necessary transformation of the models of production and consumption, and changes of orientation in relation to the natural world and the power of the States and the capital. Be considered is cited, that the political management of crisis that exists in this area is diplomacy, and what there prevails is the defence of national interests within the framework of the conditions of globalized capitalism and competition. When Governments return of large conferences in which, once again, it has evoked the notion of being at a crossroads, still obeying powerful players such as the automotive industry, seed producers, agribusiness, producers of meat, etc. In addition, can be seen clearly that the ministries of environment are relatively weak, since the themes of power are in the hands of other strongest apparatus. This is a verifiable fact in the field of biofuels.
Be considered, that when it comes to energy security and profit, critical questions and disastrous experiences are set aside. The Governments of the South, such as Brazil and Indonesia, presented the topic of agrofuels as an opportunity for growth and development. Ultimately, emphasizes Brand, what is experienced in the field of environmental policies is an attempt to reestabilizar the neoliberal-imperial globalization project driven by crises, presenting a progressive image in the development of policies environmental. The leaders of the world have understood the problem, this is what we heard in the summits of the G8 and the UNFCCC. But actually the current modalities in the field of environmental policies and resources are still being made by power and do not question the existing relations of domination. Very interesting what indicates Brand, on the theme, which is an international campaign necessary to radically transform the politics of climate change. To do so, is required to formulate claims and radical proposals through discussions and exchanges of experiences and points of view. Those claims proposals raised in the bosom of the debates and current problems and should alter the interpretation we have today of industrial Eng., lawyer.